Legal Opinion

City Messenger Service of Hollywood, Inc. v. Capitol Records Distributing Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 29, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 6659PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hogan, District Judge.

The plaintiff, at the times of interest in this case, was an “air carrier” as that term is used in Ch. 20 of 49 U. S. Code. As such, it had filed with the “Board” tariffs applicable to various of its carriages. Having done so, it was subject to 49 U. S. Code, Section 1373 and specifically (b) of that section, which provides:

*226“No air carrier shall charge or demand or collect or receive a greater or less or different compensation for air transportation, or for any service in connection therewith, than the rates, fares and charges specified in its currently effective tariffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
Thomas U. Mulligan v. Detective Schlachter, Sergeant Ware, Lieutenant Morin, and Benjamin J. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 70,731 David B. Charney, Allen J. Kraft, Harris J. Klein and Charles N. Maybruck v. Donald D. Thomas, Ira A. Lutz and Loyd GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
Robert William Crawford v. Lt. Woodrow W. Zeitler and the Toledo, Ohio, Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
United States v. Associated Air Transport, Inc., Associated Air Transport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

City Messenger Service of Hollywood, Inc., Dba City Messenger Air Express And/or C.M.A.X. v. Capitol Records Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971