Legal Opinion
S.T. Hudson Engineers, Inc. v. Camden Hotel Development Associates
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 2000No. 707 EDA 1999PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 This appeal is from the judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following the denial of Appellants Camden Hotel Development Associates (CHDA), the Camden Waterfront Development Corporation (CWDC) and Malcolm Lazin’s request for post-trial relief. After a review of the certified record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm.
¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows: Appellee S.T. Hudson, Engineers, Inc. entered into a contract with CHDA and CWDC dated October 31, 1989, 1 for engineering services related to the development of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Lumax Industries, Inc. v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Thorpe v. SchoenbrunSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Eastern Minerals & Chemicals Co. Cary W. Ahl, Sr. v. Gary H. MahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- COM. EX REL. CORBETT v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Brown, D. v. The End Zone, IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- K.A.R. v. T.G.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- GAI Consultants, Inc. v. Homestead BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.