Legal Opinion

Rush Anesthesiology Group v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1983No. 82-CC-1580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoch, J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent to dismiss, due notice having been given and the Claimants not filing any response thereto, and the Court being fully advised finds as follows:

1. That Claimants, Dr. Garla, a medical vendor, and the Rush Group, are seeking payment from the Illinois Department of Public Aid (IDPA) for medical services rendered by the doctor during November and December 1979, to an infant ward of the Department of Children and Family Services.

2. That, as fully set forth in IDPA’s department report, which is prima facie evidence of the facts therein…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rock Island Franciscan Hospital v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  2. Krakora v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  3. Treister v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989
  4. University of Chicago Professional Services Offices v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  5. St. Francis Hospital v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API