Legal Opinion

Krakora v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided September 10, 1987No. 87-CC-0399PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatchett, J.

This cause is before the Court on Respondent’s motion to dismiss. Claimant having been given due notice, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds as follows:

Claimant Krakora, a dentist, seeks a vendor payment; as provided in section 11 — 13 of the Public Aid Code (PAC) (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 23, par. 11 — 13), from funds appropriated to the Illinois Department of Public Aid (IDPA) for medical services provided to IDPA’s “recipients,” as defined in section 2 — 9 of the PAC. The subject of Dr. Krakora’s claim is services provided to his two patients, Rose Biever (Carlino) and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Good Samaritan Hospital v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1982
  2. Rush Anesthesiology Group v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1983
  3. Illini Hospital v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1977
  4. Weissman v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Treister v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989
  2. Ryan v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  3. University of Chicago Professional Services Offices v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  4. Gupta v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  5. Kim v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API