Legal Opinion

Treister v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided October 11, 1989No. 85-CC-2097PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaucci, J.

This section 11 — 13 vendor-payment action presents claims for medical services rendered by the two above-named physician Claimants to 13 patients, all being recipients under the Medical Assistance Program (MAP) administered by the Department of Public Aid (IDPA). In its departmental report, IDPA advises that it had previously paid Claimants in full for their services to seven of these recipient-patients, and that such payments, although less than Claimants’ charges, represented the maximum amounts authorized under IDPA’s pricing policy for the procedure-coded services identified in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simon v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  2. Rock Island Franciscan Hospital v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  3. Canlas v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  4. Krakora v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1987
  5. Pinckneyville Medical Group v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  2. Kim v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1991
  3. Peterson v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1990
  4. St. Anthony Hospital Medical Center v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1991
  5. Brand, Beck & Hoover, Associates v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API