Legal Opinion

Marlatt v. La Grange

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 1960No. 19198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants in error as plaintiffs sued to recover a deposit of $2,000.00 made as down payment on the purchase of a residence property from the Marlatts. Wilson & Wilson, Realtor, acted as broker in the transaction. We refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court or by name.

The option contract for sale and purchase entered into by the parties was on a printed form supplied by the Realtor, the pertinent part of which is the following:

“The entire price to be paid is Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($50.00) of which the amount as above stated is a part, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & Denver Land & Mining Co. v. TierneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  2. San Miguel Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. Stubbs & JakwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Sala v. HaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API