Legal Opinion

Sala v. Hay

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 13, 1966No. 22006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called Sala, brought suit against defendant in error, hereinafter called Hay, to recover the sum of $6,000 which was the amount due on an unpaid check and promissory note given by Hay as consideration for an option to purchase real estate which Hay did not exercise. The option agreement contained the usual provision that in the event of failure of Hay to exercise the option the $6,000 should be retained as liquidated damages. A trial was had to a jury. At the close of Sala’s case in chief the trial court dismissed the action, and entered judgment for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Marlatt v. La GrangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas Corporation v. Red Lion Homes, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sorenson v. ConnellyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Nix v. ClaryColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API