Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. Harris

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1890No. 14,525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— The complaint in this cause consists of two' paragraphs. The first is a complaint in ejectment, in the usual and ordinary form. The second seeks to recover from the appellant damages occasioned by the appropriation of the land therein described for the right of way for a railroad track, and. the use of the same for that purpose.

The third paragraph of the appellant’s answer avers that the appellant employed one Toner to obtain the right of way for its road, and to construct its road-bed over the lands of the appellee; that the road-bed was constructed over and across said land, under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Titus v. ScantlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Armstrong v. MastenNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  3. Walters v. Hutchins' AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Moore v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Hays v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Baltes v. Bass Foundry & Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fruehauf Corp. v. Review Board Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Germania Fire Insurance v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API