Legal Opinion

Titus v. Scantling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1835PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt by Edward Scantling and Sarah his wife, formerly Sarah M’Afee, against Joseph Titus. The action is founded on an arbitration-bond, executed by Titus to the said Sa?-ah previously to her marriage. The condition pf the bond is, that if Titus should perform the award of certain arbitrators to be made within a limited time, relative to a certain matter of difference between the parties, then the bond was to be void. There is no agreement in the bond, that the submission pf the parties might be made a rule of Court; and that circumstance gives rise to the only question…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Amax, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Crake v. CrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Blystone v. BurgettIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Darling v. DarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Johnson v. ChambersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API