Legal Opinion
Armistead v. Na-Mor Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 22, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CV-12006-TSHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Appellant Robert Armistead, a Court Approved Creditor in the bankruptcy of Nar-Mor, Inc. (“Debtor”), brings this appeal from an Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts dated September 22, 2016 (“Order”), denying Armistead’s Motion to Show Cause as to Why this Court Should not Find O’Donnell in Contempt, Sanction Him, Order a New Corrective Accounting and Order O’Donnell to Place Missing Funds into Escrow with the Court (“Motion to Show Cause”). Armistead also argues that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Palmacci v. UmpierrezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Rosado v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2017
- 1095 Commonwealth Corp. v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (In Re 1095 Commonwealth Corp.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Rockstone Capital LLC v. MetalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Ross v. Garcia (Garcia)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2015
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dudley v. Buffalo Rock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021