White v. Goth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, S. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment barring them from recovering on loans made to defendants. Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s use of judicial estoppel and to one of its findings of fact. Our review is limited to errors of law and whether the trial court’s decision is supported by the evidence. See Billingworth v. Bushong, 297 Or 675, 694, 688 P2d 379 (1984). For the reasons set out below, we reverse.
Plaintiffs made a series of loans to defendants Christine and Mark Goth, their daughter and son-in-law between 1992 and 1998. Some of the funds were used to start and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Caplener v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glover v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. Foxglove Properties, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. HaasYamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Jones v. RandleMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- Laing v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.