Legal Opinion

Jones v. Randle

Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided May 4, 2016No. 130303420; A156059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking to partition real property that she owns as a tenant in common with defendant, her sister. Defendant filed a counterclaim seeking to quiet-title to the property in herself. The trial court granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment on each claim, concluding that the doctrine of judicial estoppel bars plaintiff from asserting any ownership interest in the property because, in two earlier bankruptcy proceedings, plaintiff had failed to disclose her ownership interest in the house. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ah Quin v. County of Kauai Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Glover v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. HaasYamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. Northwest Public Communications Council ex rel. PSPs A to Z v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Eller v. ABM Industries Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API