Legal Opinion
Texas Co. v. Brilliant Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 30, 1924No. 3129PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The Brilliant Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called plaintiff, and the Texas ‘ Company, entered into three contracts, whereby the plaintiff was to manufacture for defendant certain advertising signs which were “42 inches in diameter, double faced, porcelain enamel.” The first was dated May 20, 1922, and was for 2,000 signs and brackets; the second was dated December 18, 1922, and was for 2,075 signs and brackets; the third was dated January 11, 1923, and was for 2,180 signs and brackets. The price was $17.50 for a sign and bracket. On February 21, 1923, the defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- H. P. Cummings Const. Co. v. Marbleloid Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- Clements v. CoppinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- SVEA Fire & Life Ins. v. State Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. Southern Piping & Erecting Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.