Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1952No. 2562PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by some fifty-five plaintiffs against five defendants to recover about $19,000 paid by the plaintiffs to the defendants and lost in a venture to discover oil. The defendants had some leasehold interests in Crook County, Wyoming, on which they wanted to drill an oil well. They did not have the money, or not sufficient money, for the drilling of the well and so they solicited the plaintiffs to raise sufficient money to pay the driller. The plaintiffs accordingly paid certain amounts of money to the defendants and a contract was entered into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. American Life Insurance v. McAdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Massey v. BeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Barnett v. KemererSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pickett v. Assocciates Discount Corp. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Landeis v. NelsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Svalina v. Big Horn National Life Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Bentzen v. H. N. Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API