Legal Opinion

Landeis v. Nelson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1991No. 90-193PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice, Retired.

In this appeal from a summary judgment entered against them, appellants1 state the issues on appeal:

*217“I. Did the trial court err by granting Summary Judgment in a case in which there are genuine issues of material fact?
“II. Did the Supreme Court err by granting Summary Judgment that was unsupported by competent evidence?”

Appellee responds in argument that there was no genuine issue of a material fact and that the summary judgment was supported by competent evidence.

We affirm.

Appellants had acquired the right to sell, in Wyoming, franchise operations known as California…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. VollrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Brereton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Nicodemus v. Union Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API