Legal Opinion

Ayres v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 2004No. A121588 A120892 A119796 A120823 and A122454PublishedCited by 16 opinions

(Cases Consolidated for Opinion Only)

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioners in these five cases are inmates in various state correctional institutions who seek judicial review of orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). The board has moved to dismiss their petitions for judicial review, arguing that petitioners, who did not timely seek board review of their “Board Action Forms” (BAFs), failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. See ORS 144.335(l)(b) (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before persons may seek judicial review of final board orders). Because the factual circumstances of each case are similar, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. McCoy v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Tuckenberry v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Taylor v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API