Legal Opinion

Ozark Dam Constructors, a Joint Venture v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1961No. 143-54PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs sue for damages alleged to have been caused them by the wrongful failure of the Government to furnish cement needed by them to maintain progress in their work of constructing the Bull Shoals Dam in Arkansas. They allege in their petition that the contract provided that the Government would supply the cement for the project; that the Government had contracted for the cement with a cement mill in Independence, Kansas, and had arranged for its transportation via the Missouri Pacific Railroad from Independence to Cotter, Arkansas, where the plaintiffs were to accept…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ozark Dam Constructors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. McNamara Construction of Manitoba, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API