Legal Opinion
In Re Jeffrey M. Sullivan and Daniel Anthony Gately
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 22, 2004No. 03-1278; Interference 104,818PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Jeffrey M. Sullivan and Daniel Anthony Gately (collectively “Sullivan”) appeal from a decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in which the Board entered judgment on priority against Sullivan. Sullivan v. Bingel, 2003 WL 1202245 (Bd.Pat.App & Interf.2003) (“Final Judgment”). Because the Board’s conclusion that Sullivan’s concession on priority allowed the interference to be terminated was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, unsupported by substantial evidence, or otherwise not in accordance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, and Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, and Anthony C. MinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.