Legal Opinion

Fuchs v. Idaho State Police, Alcohol Beverage Control

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2012No. 38714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case concerns the appeal of Appellant Daniel S. Fuchs (Fuchs) from the district court’s decision finding that the Director of the Idaho State Police, Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) had properly exercised his discretion when he ruled that neither party had been a prevailing party for the purposes of attorney fees. We agree that Fuchs was not a prevailing party and affirm the district court’s decision to deny attorney fees.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 6,2008, Fuchs was issued a Retail Alcohol Beverage License and subsequently opened Aubrey’s House of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Trilogy Network Systems, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jasso v. CAMAS COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Oakes v. Boise Heart Clinic Physicians, PLLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flying "A" Ranch v. County Commissioners of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. City of Ririe v. GilgenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Sullivan v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Upper Valley Community Health Svcs, Inc. v. Madison CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API