Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1993No. Nos. 90-56230, 91-55044PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Rana Research, Inc. and its president/sole shareholder Vipin Sahgal (“Defendants”) appeal judgments permanently enjoining them from violating section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 1 Ob-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The district court had jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u, 78aa, and this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Defendants raise numerous contentions on appeal, the majority of which we resolve in an unpublished memorandum disposition filed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc. (D/b/a Vista Group, Ltd.), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc. (D/b/a Vista Group, Ltd.), Vipin Sahgal, Robert H. BretzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- CSC Sugar LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- CSC Sugar LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Joanna Pitzen, et al. v. Atlantic Animal Health, Inc. d/b/a Squire Laboratories, Inc. and Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Wainscott v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021