Legal Opinion
Joanna Pitzen, et al. v. Atlantic Animal Health, Inc. d/b/a Squire Laboratories, Inc. and Neogen Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 11, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00196Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOANNA PITZEN, et al., Case No.: 25-cv-0196-ABJ-DEB 12 ORDER: Plaintiff, 13 (1) DENYING DEFENDANT v. 14 NEOGEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS ATLANTIC ANIMAL HEALTH, INC. (Doc. No. 63) 15 d/b/a SQUIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 16 and NEOGEN CORPORATION, (2) DENYING DEFENDANT NEOGEN’S MOTION FOR MORE 17 Defendants. DEFINITE STATEMENT (Doc. No. 64) 18 19 20 Before the Court are two pending motions: (1) Defendant Neogen Corporation’s 21 (“Neogen”) Motion to Dismiss the Fraud-Based Claims in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint 22 (Doc.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.