Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. City of Vallejo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 15, 2007No. Civ. S-05-1098 RRB JFMPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Opinion and Order

RALPH R. BEISTLINE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Wynathen Ketchum (“Ket-chum”) and Ana Menjivar (“Menjivar”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed an action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Vallejo police officers against the City of Vallejo (“Defendant”) seeking to recover unpaid compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). Defendant now moves for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs’ FLSA claim is time-barred. Alternatively, Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs are not…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gessele v. Jack in the Box, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  2. Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  3. Carl Williams v. Irwin Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. Howes v. Phoenix Fire Protection, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
  5. Lambro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API