Ketchum v. City of Vallejo
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Opinion and Order
RALPH R. BEISTLINE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Wynathen Ketchum (“Ket-chum”) and Ana Menjivar (“Menjivar”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed an action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated Vallejo police officers against the City of Vallejo (“Defendant”) seeking to recover unpaid compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”). Defendant now moves for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs’ FLSA claim is time-barred. Alternatively, Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs are not…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gessele v. Jack in the Box, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Carl Williams v. Irwin Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Howes v. Phoenix Fire Protection, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
- Lambro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.