Legal Opinion
Carl Williams v. Irwin Industries, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 11, 2020No. 2:15-cv-02480Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 CARL CURTIS; ARTHUR WILLIAMS, Case № 2:15-cv-02480-ODW (Ex) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ 14 IRWIN INDUSTRIES, INC.; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 15 DOES 1–100, [44] Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiffs Carl Curtis and Arthur Williams (“Plaintiffs”) move for leave to file a 20 second amended complaint (“SAC”) in this wage and hour class action). (Mot. for 21 Leave to File SAC (“Mot.”), ECF No. 44.) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a SAC 22…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.