Legal Opinion

Marengo v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1901No. Nos. 12,745, 12,746—(114, 115)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Separate actions in the district court for Hennepin county by Agno Marengo, as father of Camile Marengo, an infant, to recover $35,000 for personal injuries to the boy, and by Agno Marengo individually to recover $3,500 for loss of services of his son by reason of such injuries.

Read the full summary

Separate actions in the district court for Hennepin county by Agno Marengo, as father of Camile Marengo, an infant, to recover $35,000 for personal injuries to the boy, and by Agno Marengo individually to recover $3,500 for loss of services of his son by reason of such injuries. By consent the two cases were tried together before Elliott, J., and a jury, which rendered separate verdicts in favor of plaintiff; in the first case for $8,000, and in the second case for $1,200. From an order granting a motion for judgment in favor of defendant in each case notwithstanding the verdict and denying a…

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Camile Marengo, an infant of tender years, went upon the tracks ■of defendant in Northeast Minneapolis, and while there was seriously injured by one of its trains. The father of Camile brings suit to recover for the injuries to his minor son under the •statute (G-. S. 1894, § 5164); also a separate action for the damages which he sustains as the child’s parent. The cases were tried together. Separate verdicts were rendered for plaintiff in each ■case. Defendant moved for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts, or for new trials in the alternative. The trial court ordered judgments for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Rosse v. St. Paul & Duluth Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Marquardt v. HubnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Kreatz v. St. Cloud School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Schreiner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Palyo v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Johnson v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Mattes v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API