Legal Opinion

Curtiss Candy Co. v. Johnson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1932No. 30016PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-owen, J.

On issue joined between W. I. Johnson, appellee, and the Curtiss Candy Company, appellant, on a declaration alleging a breach of implied warranty, the appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant for three thousand dollars; and an appeal is prosecuted here.

The material facts are that the appellee, Johnson, purchased from W. B. Thomas, a retail dealer, a piece of bar candy labeled “Biaby Ruth Candy, The Curtiss Candy Company. ’ ’ The candy was purchased in Marion county, at a filling station operated by Thomas, who also sold candy and other merchandise. The candy was taken from a large…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ChapmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Nehi Bottling Company v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Rainwater v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jackson Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. GrubbsMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Harrist v. Spencer-Harris Tool Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API