Legal Opinion

Mannausau v. Wallace

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kirme, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Beplevin for a horse.

In 1888, one Samuel Mannausau brought an action of replevin for this same horse, in a justice’s court in the county of Wayne, against the plaintiff in this case. In the former suit judgment was rendered for the defendant, who took judgment' for the return of the property. Samuel Mannausau, upon the delivery of the property to him by the officer, took it to the county of Washtenaw, and sold it to the defendant. McGlora Mannausau, being unable to obtain the property under an execution in Wayne county, went to the defendant in Washtenaw county, made a demand of defendant for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cary v. HewittMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Steele v. Marlborough Hall Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Roberts v. MooneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lindsay v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API