Legal Opinion
Bean v. Central Maine Power Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 21, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
On complaints for flowing under R. S., Chap. 106, Secs. 1-88, bills of exceptions to the ruling of the superior court were argued together before the law court.
The erection and operation of Wyman Dam, between Moscow and Pleasant Ridge, in Somerset County, occasioned a material change in the surface level of the Kennebec River above the dam, and flowing of riparian lands on each side, including such lands of both plaintiffs, the Bingham Company land, at the southerly bound of Carrying Place Plantation, west of the river, and the Bean Land, in Carratunk, east of the river and far above the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tyler v. WilkinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1827
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Calumet & Arizona Mining Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1918
- Turner v. NyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Gerlach v. GruettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
- Munsey v. GrovesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Verreault v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.