Calumet & Arizona Mining Co. v. Chambers
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Cochise. A. G. McAlister, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, C. J.
The plaintiff expressly alleges in his complaint “that this action is brought under the provisions *57of title 14, chapter 6, Civil'Code of Arizona of 1913.” Consequently, he is precluded by such election of remedy from a recovery other than permissible under said employers’ liability law. The sufficiency of his complaint to state facts constituting a cause of .action given by such statute must be tested with reference to the requirements of said statute, and the proof must support the complaint both as to the facts authorizing a recovery and as to the amount of damages recovered.
The defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. CastleSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. MendezArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Superior & Pittsburg Copper Co. v. TomichArizona Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southwest Cotton Co. v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. EgichArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Crozier v. NoriegaArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Young Mines Co. v. BlackburnArizona Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.