Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1886No. 12,920PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

The second and fifth counts of the indictment were non-prossed. The court below sustained a motion to quash the first, third, fourth and sixth counts. The State, by its prosecuting attorney, excepted, prosecutes this appeal, and assigns that ruling as error.

The • substance of the first count is, that on the 15th day of June, 1884, appellee unlawfully, feloniously and corruptly offered and promised John B. Fortenbaugh, a township trustee, that if he, as such trustee, would purchase of appellee twelve sets of reading charts for the township, and pay him therefor the sum of $175, he would sign…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Inglis v. State, ex rel. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. State v. SammonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Shircliff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API