Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Lord & Spencer, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 11, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract by a common carrier to recover the amount due for freight charges on a shipment of a carload of lettuce from California to Baltimore, Maryland, less the proceeds from the sale of the lettuce in Baltimore. It was agreed at the trial that the *180plaintiff was a common carrier of freight and being the final carrier was the proper party to bring this action, and there is no dispute as to the amount due to it. The only controversy was whether the defendant was a party liable. Material facts were admitted or shown by uncontradicted testimony for the defendant as follows:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ferrick v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. F. E. Mathias Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Reading Co. v. SobelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API