Legal Opinion

Todd v. Huntington

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLoud, J.

The appellant presents but one question for our decision. It is involved in the giving and refusing an instruction. The action was brought upon an express contract for the construction of certain buildings, and also for the same work upon quantum meruit. By election, the trial proceeded upon quantum meruit. The bill of exceptions shows that there was evidence tending to prove that the work, labor, and materials were rendered and furnished, and were reasonably worth the amount alleged in the complaint; that the work, labor, and materials were rendered and furnished under an express contract to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steeples v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Murray's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Rose v. U. S. Lumber & Box Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. West v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Paterson v. CondosNevada Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API