Legal Opinion

Rose v. U. S. Lumber & Box Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

It is admitted by the pleadings that the parties to this action made the following agreement in writing:

“Agreement entered into this 21st day of February, 1920, by and between D. Y. Rose operating under the firm name of the Rose Lumber Company of Pacific City, Oregon, party of the first part and the U. S. Lumber and Box Company of Portland, Oregon, a corporation, existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Oregon, party of the second part, Witnesseth:
“Whereas, the party of the first part is engaged in the manufacture of lumber and is not prepared to market the same and whereas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Longfellow v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Easton v. QuackenbushOregon Supreme Court · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bell v. SpainOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Adams v. Northwest Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Columbia Digger Sand & Gravel Co. v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Trachsel v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Davis v. WOOD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API