Legal Opinion
United States v. Weekley
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided April 3, 1992No. CR-91-072-JLQPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO ENHANCE SENTENCE
QUACKENBUSH, Chief Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s Request to Enhance Defendant’s Sentence in the above-entitled matter heard on April 1, 1992. Assistant United States Attorney Thomas 0. Rice appeared for the Plaintiff. The Defendant appeared personally and through his court-appointed attorney Michael D. Kinkley. Having reviewed the record, heard from counsel and being fully advised in this matter, this Opinion is intended to memorialize the oral rulings of the court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Request to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Dale M. Preston, A/K/A Jami Mansour ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Herman E. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Edward Harry Weekley, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charles Martin PermenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006