United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Edward Harry Weekley, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WRIGHT.
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
A risk is a risk. But a risk of a risk is not enough of a risk. Every predicate attempted burglary conviction under the Armed Career Criminal Act must encompass conduct posing a risk of violent confrontation. It is not enough that most convictions would encompass such conduct.
BACKGROUND
The district court sentenced Edward Weekley to 65 months imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The government argued that because he had three prior violent felony convictions, two for burglary and one for attempted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Darren J. Custis, United States of America v. Darren J. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Donnie Roy O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Herman E. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Abel Casarez-Bravo, D.C. NoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Brett Wayne WoffordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Paul Bradley WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Henry Nash RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.