Legal Opinion
State v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 26, 2008No. 36269-4-II, 36270-8-II, 37164-2-4-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
191 P.3d 83 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Amber Dee ROSE, Petitioner.
State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Danielle Wilson, Petitioner.
State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Kevin Wentz, Petitioner.
Nos. 36269-4-II, 36270-8-II, 37164-2-4-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 26, 2008.
Bruce J. Finlay, Attorney at Law, Shelton, WA, for Petitioners.
Michael K. Dorcy, Mason County Prosecutors Office, Shelton, WA, for Respondent.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
¶ 1 Amber Dee Rose, Danielle Wilson, and Kevin Wentz appeal the trial court's decision in their respective cases to impose weekly urinalysis…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Raymond Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State Of Washington, V Quran D. A. IngramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Brittanie OlsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Blomstrom v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.