Legal Opinion

State v. Rankin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2004No. 72509-8PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

The principal issue we are asked to resolve in this consolidated case is this: whether a police officer violates article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution when the officer requests identification from a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle but lacks an *692articulable suspicion that the passenger has engaged in criminal activity. The Court of Appeals concluded that although an officer in such a circumstance cannot demand identification from a passenger, an officer does not violate the state constitution by merely requesting that the passenger produce identification. We disagree with…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BrockobWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API