State v. Rankin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.
The principal issue we are asked to resolve in this consolidated case is this: whether a police officer violates article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution when the officer requests identification from a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle but lacks an *692articulable suspicion that the passenger has engaged in criminal activity. The Court of Appeals concluded that although an officer in such a circumstance cannot demand identification from a passenger, an officer does not violate the state constitution by merely requesting that the passenger produce identification. We disagree with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BrockobWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.