Seybold Mach. Co. v. Feehan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Safer, Judge. Action at law by Jerry A. Feehan against the Seybold Machine Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error, the Seybold Machine Company, seeks reversal of a judgment against it in favor of the defendant in error, Jerry A. Feehan, for $6,000, for the loss of his right hand, claimed to. have been caused by the negligence of its servant,. Elmer G. Page. It is a manufacturer of paper cutters at Dayton, Ohio, and, the latter part of November, 1910, sold the Courier Journal Job Printing Company, operating a printing establishment at Louisville, Ky., two such cutters, for $1,750 in money and an old cutter. By the contract it was “to erect” them on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Necker v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Crandall v. BoutellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Maroa v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Marlow v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Buckley v. Burlington Northern Railroad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington Securities & Investment Corp. v. Horse Heaven Heights, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.