Legal Opinion

Necker v. Harvey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The injury for which this suit is brought was occasioned by the fall of an elevator upon which the plaintiff at the time was standing. The elevator was manufactured by the defendant for the Detroit Soap Company, under a contract that it should lift two thousand pounds easily, by steam or hand power. It was put up in the factory of the *519.soap company on May 27th, 1881, and the fall occurred through the breaking of the main shaft three days thereafter. Plaintiff was a workman in the employ of the soap company, ..and was engaged in loading the elevator with a load of less than two thousand pounds…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Goodlander Mill Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  2. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Casey v. Wrought Iron Bridge Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Daugherty v. HerzogIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API