Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeksonius, J.

Upon the hearing of this motion the plaintiff raised the preliminary objection that the defendant, being in contempt for non-payment of alimony, could not be heard on this motion to reduce the alimony. The matter was submitted, the preliminary objections to be first determined.

Briefly, the parties were divorced about 1922. Pending the litigation and since the entry of judgment, the defendant paid the alimony awarded until late in 1931, when, because of alleged illness, he failed to pay.

On application of the plaintiff the defendant was adjudged in contempt for failure to pay the sum of $225.

Fro…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hovey v. . ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Harney v. HarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Staples v. StaplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Triest v. TriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Reichel v. SollazzoNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API