Legal Opinion

Triest v. Triest

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1944No. Civ. 12728PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

On November 8, 1940, plaintiff and appellant, Lorraine B. Triest, secured an interlocutory decree of divorce from defendant and respondent, Frank Triest. The custody of their minor child was awarded to the wife, and the husband was ordered to pay to his wife $100 a month for alimony and maintenance and. support of the wife and child. On December 6, 1942, the minor child died.- On December 10, 1942, the husband had the final decree entered.

From the date of the entry of the interlocutory decree, and until either January or February, 1943, the husband made all the required $100 per month…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gloth v. GlothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wilder v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Suozzo v. SuozzoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  5. Wylie v. WylieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zirkle v. ZirkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Levy v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Bratnober v. BratnoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Moore v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API