Reichel v. Sollazzo

The plaintiff wife’s motion to punish the defendant husband for contempt of court for failure to make payments pursuant to a final judgment of divorce, is denied. The defendant husband’s cross motion to modify the final judgment by annulling the provision directing payments of alimony, is granted.

The facts are undisputed. On September 25, 1952, the parties entered into a separation agreement which provided that the ‘ ‘ Husband shall pay to the Wife * * * for alimony * * * $25.00 per week, which payments shall not cease upon her remarriage, and are to continue during the lifetime of the Wife,”…