Legal Opinion
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Weinstein
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 2016No. 33,787 34,042 34,077PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Appellants’ motion for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed in this case on March 24, 2016, is withdrawn and this Opinion is substituted in its place.
{2} Intervenors Frank Foy, Suzanne Foy, and John Casey (Appellants) appeal the district court’s approval of settlements between the New Mexico State Investment Council (NMSIC) and three sets of defendants. Having consolidated the three appeals, we consider whether the district court’s approval of the settlements was consistent with the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act and whether NM SIC’s Litigation Committee complied…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Human Services Department v. StaplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Oppenheimer & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Benavidez v. Bernalillo Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- State Ex Rel. Foy v. Vanderbilt Capital AdvisorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019