Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wherry
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. As we noted in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, “The continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.” The appropriate sanction when a lawyer knowingly converts funds for the lawyer’s benefit is disbarment. Cf. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 348, 678 N.E.2d 515. In this case, respondent not only converted funds but also filed false reports with the probate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Medina County Bar Ass'n v. WoottonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Counsel v. WherryOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. LavinOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. ParrishOhio Supreme Court · 2009