Legal Opinion
In Re Tyson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 20, 1961No. 237PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The appeal requires an interpretation of our Employment Security Law (G.S. c. 96) and the application of that interpretation to the facts.
These are the facts: Swift had for many years operated a plant at Rocky Mount. It built a new and larger plant at Wilson. In the fall of 1958 it began to reduce its operation at Rocky Mount. Because of this reduction it was not able to provide all of its regular employees with regular work. During the summer and fall of 1958, some óf its employees applied for and were awarded unemployment benefits. They were not, however, permanently separated from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ackerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Globe-Democrat Publishing Co. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hock v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Bayle v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re ShulerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Thornbrough v. GageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961