Legal Opinion

Ackerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1951No. Nos. 35,432, 35,433PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Certiorari to division of employment and security to review a decision of the director allowing unemployment benefits to respondents.

The facts are not in dispute. Relator maintains a nationwide communications service. Prior to World War II, relator determined that in order to operate profitably and meet competition it was necessary to mechanize its transmitting and receiving operations. The war delayed the program, but upon cessation of the armed conflict the program of mechanization was again taken up and carried through to completion.

Realizing that mechanization would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Bucko v. J. F. Quest Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Owens v. Press Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Barrett v. Weyerhaeuser Co. Severance Pay PlanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API