Legal Opinion

Mills v. Seattle & Montana Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1895No. 1470PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

This was an action for damages, brought by the respondent upon substantially the same state of facts,, and upon the terms of a similar deed, as were presented in Moorman v. Seattle & Montana Ry. Co., 8 Wash. 98 (35 Pac. 596).

But in this case the damages proved and recovered related wholly to the increased value of her land, which respondent alleges she would have realized had the ditch been constructed as provided for in the deed, and to the loss suffered by her in consequence of the failure of the appellant to-so construct and maintain the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webster v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Moorman v. Seattle & Montana Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sanitary District of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Grove v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. O. R. & N. Co. v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Red River, T. & S. Ry. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API