Hautau v. Kearney & Trecker Corporation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12, F.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A. arising out of an action for patent infringement brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant, a Wisconsin corporation.
The sole ground for the motion is an allegation that there is no venue in this district.
In essence, the complaint alleges that the defendant corporation is manufacturing infringing machines in Wisconsin and is “actively inducing” third parties to infringe the plaintiffs’ patent in this district by soliciting orders through defendant’s agents in its sales office in the City of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Deering, Milliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Welding Engineers, Inc. v. Ætna-Standard Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Marston v. GantDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972
- Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bangor Baptist Church v. State of Me., Dept. of Educ.District Court, D. Maine · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.