Legal Opinion
Montano v. Kin-Therm, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 28, 1985No. 2666PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendants1 appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs in an action on a promissory note. We find error.
On December 22,1970, the plaintiffs, Dominick and Freida Montano, executed a promissory note in the amount of $35,000, secured by a mortgage on their real property, in favor of Hartford National Bank. This note was made at the request of their son, Donald Montano, who was an officer and shareholder in the defendant Kin-Therm, Inc. The president of Kin-Therm and Donald Montano both signed the note as guarantors. The $35,000 was then loaned by the plaintiffs to Kin-Therm pursuant to a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Strimiska v. YatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Lundberg v. KovacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farrell v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Borkowski v. SachetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Doyle v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Berdon v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. Inc., No. Cv90-0304940 (Apr. 23, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Saginaw Products Corp. v. CavalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996