Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. City of Fremont

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2006No. A112386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

This appeal requires us to construe a provision of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 54950 et seq.) that prohibits a majority of the members of a local legislative body, when outside a noticed public meeting, from using “direct communication, personal intermediaries, or technological devices ... to develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken on an item.” (§ 54952.2, subd. (b).)

The police department of the City of Fremont (City) devised a new policy to govern its response to activated home invasion alarms. Plaintiff J. Dennis Wolfe alleges…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kunde v. SeilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Page v. Miracosta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Preskar v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API