Legal Opinion

In re Collins

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cropsey, J.:

There is no denial of the allegations of the petition. The use of the premises in question has been a business one, more or less continuous, for a number of years, beginning prior to the enactment of the Building Zone Resolution. They had never been used, however, as a laundry until recently. The premises are in a residence *778district, and therein a laundry is not permitted. It is contended, however, that because a business was conducted there when the zoning provisions became effective the business use may be changed and the premises used for any business. I find no authority for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Facey v. . LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Wohl v. LeoNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Facey v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. People ex rel. Facey v. LeoNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People ex rel. Ventres v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keenly v. McCartyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. People v. HeinNew York Justice Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API