In re Collins
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cropsey, J.:
There is no denial of the allegations of the petition. The use of the premises in question has been a business one, more or less continuous, for a number of years, beginning prior to the enactment of the Building Zone Resolution. They had never been used, however, as a laundry until recently. The premises are in a residence *778district, and therein a laundry is not permitted. It is contended, however, that because a business was conducted there when the zoning provisions became effective the business use may be changed and the premises used for any business. I find no authority for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Facey v. . LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People ex rel. Wohl v. LeoNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- People ex rel. Facey v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- People ex rel. Facey v. LeoNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- People ex rel. Ventres v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keenly v. McCartyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- People v. HeinNew York Justice Court · 1945